Justice and Judgement in Charles Dickens’s “A Tale Of Two Cities”Equity is what we as a society respect as “right” based on our ethical concepts of morals, level headedness, law, religion, value and decency. No one is exempt from the law. Respect for the rule of law is is a critical necessity to protect justice in a democracy.
It guarantees that all choices and activities of people are in line with a country’s laws. It moreover guarantees that individuals with control do not make choices around our lives in an self-assertive and unusual way, based on their personal hatret. if requirements and importance of justice are not provided well, it is called “social injustice”.
Social injustice implies infringement of the rights of others; unsjust or unfair impact or treatment. In Victorian era, social injustice was prevailing and came into forward with the rise of Industrial Revolution. This Revolution became the cause of numerous contrasts among masses.
The individuals related to upper class look on destitute individuals with scorn eyes. They never wanted to share any kind of thing with destitute individuals, lower class was inferior for them. Charles Dickens clarified the problems of social classes; poverty,child labor,lack of education and exploitation of masses in his novels. ” A Tale Of Two Cities” was one of them. The novel takes place during the French Revolution. The French individuals and England were tired of the social and financial imbalances enforced by the rulling monarchy.
The aristocracy and clergy lived a life of extravagance while individuals in the Third Estate paid most of the charges and didn’t have as many rights. Dickens’ social thoughts in this novel are clear: the French Revolution was unavoidable since the aristocracy exploited and plundered the indigents, the situations led them to revolt. One of Dickens’ most grounded feelings was that the English individuals might erupt at any moment into a mass of bloody revolutionists.
The Judgement was a problem too in A Tale of Two Cities, as delineated by Dickens, is that of a hypocritical and corrupt organization that favored the wealthy people and overlooked the plight of the destitute ones. Dickens remarks on the absurdity of the court and Dickens’ novel may be a delicate reminder that, given the opportunity, the indigent people will use the similiar brutal, even virulent strategies that they consider to be typical of the rich.Making his way through the tainted crowd, dispersed up and down this hideous scene of action, with the skill of a man accustomed to make his way quietly, the messenger found out the door he sought, and handed in his letter through a trap in it. (45) This line demonstrates how everything about the court system had an attitude of aberrance. Demonstrates Dickens’ hatred with the corruption and untrustworthiness of the individuals in the court system counting the chief judge, members of the jury, and other spectators at the trial.”When the Attorney-General ceased, a buzz arose in the court as if a cloud of great blue-flies were swarming about the prisoner, in anticipation of what he was soon to become. When toned down again, the unimpeachable patriot appeared in the witness-box”.(68) Charles Dickens utilizes the blue flies as an imagery for the courtroom.
The individuals of the court were beguiling and dishonest except Mr. Darnay. Indeed the judge in this chapter was blaming the guiltless person, making an unjustifiable trial. This corruption appalled Dickens so awful that he would compare the individuals in the courtroom to an item so revolting that flies would assemble around them as they talked of their evasiveness and favoritism. This represented an image of griminess and squander as Dickens depicts it. His thought went so distant into detail that he was able to provide the readers a recognition of this destructive justice called a courtroom.Another way Dickens adequately passes on his feelings toward the system is how the individuals in the courtroom seen Mr.
Darnay and his punishment. Dickens helps us to see the coldness in the court when he says: “The accused, who was (and who knew he was) being mentally hanged, beheaded, and quartered, by everybody there, neither flinched from the situation, nor assumed any theatrical air in it. He was quiet and attentive; watched the opening proceedings with a grave interest; and stood with his hands resting on the slab of wood before him, so composedly, that they had not displaced a leaf of the herbs with which it was strewn. The court was all bestrewn with herbs and sprinkled with vinegar, as a precaution against gaol air and gaol fever”. (64) Dickens clarifies to the reader that the individuals in the courtroom were aware of his punishment and did not concern themselves that he would be put to death in such a brutal way. It would be just a typical day for the townspeople. In truth, they would pay for the hanging of the man and cheer a while later.
This disgusted Dickens to see such primitive acts towards another member of the community, that he would expose the court so clearly. The feeling of the court was diminutive of heart that Dickens would reveal, to the final detail, of cruelty for the readers to vision.