The some resources, makes it impossible to maintain

Thedevelopment of technology is the basis for the establishment of the New Order,beyond the geopolitical struggles that we see.Itshould be noted that, at the same time, a false discourse has been developingin the alternative media for years, whose main function is to divert attentionand generate false hopes and expectations, so that a large number of people whocall themselves woke can swallow the lie that there is a change or a rebellionagainst the elites.

Itis the way to get these potentially rebellious masses of people to believe thatthey have won the battle and accept the foundations of the New Order.However,the reality is unalike.Manyof the maneuvers that go against the “evil elites who control theworld” had already been foreseen and calculated earlier by those sameelites, who are designing the New Order.Thealternative media has for years inoculated us with the concept that all thepower of the elites lies in the control of central banks and the issuance ofcurrency.Thatwas true of the old model we are about to abandon. The issuance of trust moneyand the generation of debt were a crucial instrument to seize what has realvalue: raw materials and all natural resources.Nevertheless,that system of functioning will cease to be applicable in the future that thesesame elites are planning. Moreover, it will be because of technologicaldevelopment, which is the key that changes everything and the force shapingfuture socio-economic structures.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Technological development, combined with theincrease in population and the scarcity of some resources, makes it impossibleto maintain the old structures of the system in operation.Manythings will have to change in order to adapt to the new situation, which hasbeen planned for a long time: the central banks are going to disappear, or atthe very least, their power will gradually fade away.Thedigital age has changed everything.

The money too. This is how the so-called”cryptocoins” are born, which are digital units created as a means ofpayment in the virtual world and have gradually become an investment methodbecause of their ability to acquire value and reliability in the market. Theconcept behind blockchain, bitcoin and other forms of cryptocurrencies ingeneral were meant to function as a new, decentralized form of money withoutthe power of an intermediary institution, something that sounds a little bittoo good to be true. Thatconcept turned into a system entirely dominated by just a handful of people:two Chinese miners, Antpool and DiscusFish/F2Pool, take up more than half ofthe blocks created. Based on free electricity and calculating power, they areable to modify the rules at will. Whatno one is talking about is the lack of consumer protection.

The further thatthey are developed, they could significantly alter the way in which financialintermediation is conducted with monetary, exchange rate and financialstability implications. As assets, they are subject to liens on equity andcapital gains.Inaddition, the network is on the edge of collapsing, technical wise.

Themechanisms that should have prevented this outcome have crashed. Consequently,nowadays there is no reason to think BTC or other cryptocurrencies can performbetter or be more beneficial than the monetary system we already live in. Theproblem of blockchain is in its design: the dependence on mining, an industrialactivity based on the provision of infrastructure, places any blockchainproduct in the custody of anyone who succeeds in attracting large-scalecapital.

Thegrowing dependence of the blockchain system on miners not only tended to makethe stability of bitcoin and its derivatives dependent on a limited anddecreasing number of agents, but in the long run they could change the rules ofthe game.Bitcoinand blockchain are systems that at the end meet the logic of large scale, theirown structure eliminates the control/capture of central banks to replace it bythe possibility of capture by those large masses of capital that do not findtoday where to be placed. Ifcentral banks already have little democratic control through political ormarket representation, what can we expect from a couple of Chinese anonymousmillionaires? To be replaced by their even greater colleagues on Wall Street orthe City of London?Therefore,do not believe the lies of alternative media that tell you that the collapse ofcentral banks is a “rebel victory” or an “elite coup”. You can already guesswhere that speech comes from and what its real function is.Weall know that crypto coins are the future. However, it is naive to believe thatthey have emerged coincidentally and caught the wicked central bankers unprepared.Thegovernment administration may be responsible for the birth of thecryptocurrency space.

Therefore, it is completely under their control, which iswhy there is a chance that they are using Bitcoin, whose creation for years hasbeen surrounded by a mysterious mist, as a first step, a global experiment to studythe introduction of crypto.Asa goal, they aim to allow the public to become familiar and trustful of cryptocurrenciesbefore eliminating them as private property altogether, to afterwards substitutethem with one government-controlled cryptocurrency.Thisnew currency would utilize a blockchain that is under the complete control ofgovernment, and at the same time, the authorities would eliminate the usage ofall physical currency. What this means is that they are allowed to ban physicaldollars and all privately issued cryptocurrencies to then enforce a economicsystem that is constituted entirely on electronic money, completely dominatedby government authorities. Thiswould eliminate the underground economy and allow the currency to impose anylevel of negative interest rate it sees appropriate to accomplish its inflationgoals. Atthe same time, because of the impracticality of exchanging paper money, itstops the average individual from hoarding it to escape the loss of its acquiringpower.

The government is now granted full power to monitor every transaction onthe new currency blockchain, using the pretext that it is simply a maneuver todecrease tax evasion, money laundering or secret criminal activity.Itshould not come as a surprise, since this way of economical thinking iscongruent with the long record governments have with the interest of migratingaway from gold-backed fiduciary currencies. The main purpose of thesecryptocurrencies is to push interest rates into negative territory in order toincrease monetary velocity and supply.Otherwise,the authorities are just studying how cryptocurrencies develop, theirapplications and how people respond to them, to afterwards allow the centralbanks to take over. It will appear that they regulate nothing and thateverything works alone, without “very bad bankers controlling everythingfrom the shadows”.

Nonetheless,it is most probable that things will not work that way. New models of economicand social control will be established, making the old structures obsolete.China,which is the testing ground of the New Order at all levels, shows us this veryclearly: Beijing decided to follow the well-known maxim, “if you cannot beatthem, join them”.Byorganizing a special research group in 2014, the People’s Bank of Chinaintended to gradually introduce its own digital currency, making the Chineseregulator the first national bank to issue it.

`           The bank is currently studying anumber of existing cryptocurrencies such as BTC and others, the main feature ofwhich is their decentralized nature, i.e. they are almost impossible to controlby the financial authorities.Beijingis trying to avoid ceding this emerging market to private companies while thepopulation already frequently uses online payments in all transactions. Today,most Chinese people prefer to scan a QR code with their cell phones rather thaninsert a coin into a machine to buy a can of glue.Theintroduction of the digital currency by a national bank would hardly matter tothose accustomed to online payments, however, is extremely important forsellers, because instead of receiving money directly from customers, they couldget digital payments, drastically lowering transaction costs.Accordingto Duan Xinxing, vice president of OKCoin, one of China’s largest currencyexchange houses, “The digital currency would ensure that the People’s Bank ofChina would be able to control risks in the financial system and monitortransactions on an economy-wide basis.

“Tobetter understand the model of the world to which we are heading, we could usesomething like a visual metaphor.Wecould define the world in which we have lived until now as a huge complex fullof walls, doors, corridors and rooms. A place where we had no freedom to movewherever we wanted. To gain access to a room, we always had to go through adoor, where we had to ask permission from a guard and present the relevantlaissez-passer.Everythingwas, in a way, defined and controlled from above, by some directors who gaveinstructions from loudspeakers or tortured the people with long speeches fullof promises.

As time went by, they replaced the harsh voices of the old abusiveleaders with closer and more sympathetic voices that made the average personfeel better and spoke to them with more respect…

but nothing really changed.Thisgreat complex delimited by innumerable walls and rooms, was the only way tocontrol the “human flock”, because there was no other way to achieveit due to the lack of efficient control technologies.However,technological development is making that old complex of high walls and armedguards obsolete. None of that will be necessary to control the masses anymore.Theworld is heading to a gigantic and diaphanous concentration camp with noapparent limits.

The human flock will be confined in an open space with novisible walls or restrictions, surrounded by a sort of force field. Within thelimits of that concentration camp, we can organize ourselves as we please. Atleast, that is the way things seem to be.Byhaving crypto coins that appear to work on their own and 3D printers to printthe products, people design themselves.

The police officers and guards will bereplaced by algorithms and hidden cameras, which will give a false sense offreedom. People will be more guarded and controlled than ever before, butwithout having to cross their gaze with a rough and intimidating uniformedguard. When they misbehave, there will not be three big cops coming to beat themup, they will be simply struck by lightning.Ourown self-management will generate the illusion of freedom.Beforewe wanted to break down walls to escape; and we had that impulse because thewall was there, covering the landscape and projecting its dark shadow; but ifthere are no walls, the illusion is generated that we are free, and no onethinks of escaping. A self-confined and self-controlled system is generated.Weourselves will be our own wall.Thestark reality is they will have total control over the people.

In addition,they will do so by the simple fact that we will be 100% dependent on the rawmaterials and technological devices supplied to us from corporations controlledby the high spheres.Weused to live in a world of hammers, nails and wooden boards. In order to beable to live, more or less everyone could build a hut and plough to cultivatethe land. We are now in a world of microchips and high frequency computing andin order to live, we need a smartphone and a computer.

Truefreedom will be achieved when critical thinking that promotes social, human,psychological and spiritual change, as well as cultural, economic andtechnological change conquers our society, but if we put all our hope incutting-edge science and technology, we are doomed. Inwhose hands would be all or most of these technologies and how and for whatpurpose would we use them? In the meantime, what do we do? In order to havecheap, low energy needs and high energy-efficient technologies that are easilyusable and meet all or most of our material, cultural and other needs, how manyyears will it take?Thecurrent currencies are not directly supported by anything more than confidencein the currency itself, and this allows governments to make major interventionson the economy, as experienced in the housing crisis of 2007. Thecurrent system is very imperfect, however, it allows central banks to controlcredit or price stability by expanding or contracting the amount of money inthe market.Onthe other hand, there is the hypotheses that a bitcoin-based world economywould be a return to the gold standard, i.e.

the rigid supply of currency,since this cryptocurrency will cease to be produced when it reaches 21 million BTC.80%of the total bitcoins have already been extracted by the miners and thedifficulty of their extraction grows exponentially (every time the growth innumber of bitcoins is slower, the system has been designed this way).Theuniversal use of BTC would mean stripping governments of monetary policy andbeing able to shrink and expand the monetary mass when they need it, forgettingthe lesson we learned in the Great Depression. Bitcoin’s creator, SatoshiNakamoto, explained in his white paper that bitcoin would eliminate inflation.That is why bitcoin attracts gold bugs and anything contrary to governmentintervention in the currency.Weare experiencing a contradiction in which more and more voices are calling forthe elimination of physical money to combat tax fraud and criminal activities,while at the same time giving credibility to bitcoin, which makes it even moredifficult to monitor transactions.

Sweden is making progress in reducing thecash share of its economy. Every few years, Spain limits the amount of moneyyou can pay in cash for a transaction, forcing you to identify yourselfelectronically. How is this compatible with a currency that leaves no trace ofwho issues and receives a transaction? How does this help the fight againstfraud and crime? How many bitcoin inverters are tax compliant?Thereis also talk of ecological disaster. We are emitting between 8,000 and 13,000kilograms of CO2 into the atmosphere for each BTC extracted from mainly Chinesefarms whose electricity comes from coal. Inefficient even if people are lookingfor creative applications.

Blockchainis fashionable currently, and we follow like sheep: however, when we dig deep,we see the many flaws that it would represent as the weapon of choice of theNew World. There must be another way to combat the elites, one that is not asrushed in and utopic as this one.


I'm Casey!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out