The world’s energy dynamic is altering in response to dominant economic, security, and environmental forces. Investment in and deployment of electricity infrastructure is averting from the industrialized economies of the Northern Hemisphere to the emerging economies of the “global south” developing nations that be liable to be disproportionally devoted in the Southern Hemisphere and from conventional fossil fuels concerning advanced clean energy technologies. The Security Council debate was not a segregated event.
It was one of a occurring recently spate of reports and conferences in which climate change has been identi?ed as a subject of national and international security. It can also have been contemplated as part of trend since the late 1990s of nontraditional threats such as HIV?AIDS, human rights and transnational crime. Framing such issues as security importance is often presented as a way of gaining surveillance from high-level decision makers and mobilizing materials. Over the past five years, the growing economic and demographic weight of China, India and other emerging economies has outrun to an appealing shift in the position of those countries regionally as well as globally. The foreign policy of both China and India is instantly changing.
Energy security and climate change are defining constituents of this shift from being emerging economy to becoming visible power, both regionally and more of a global scope. China’s and India’s international partners, not least the European Union, must re-orient their foreign policy strategies suitably. China’s and India’s economies are growing at a groundbreaking velocity. Due to high economic blooming based on rapid industrialization the energy squandering of both countries is ascending fast. Both countries have linked the group of the world’s biggest importers of oil and gas.
China reckon on its state energy companies to approach new resources at home and abroad. India’s energy sector is principally privatized. However, India’s government plays a vital role in politically supporting the international multiplication of its energy sector. In fact, energy and, to a strengthening extent, climate change, have become defining components of both countries’ foreign policy as well as of the international topic in which they find themselves. A futuristic “energy foreign policy” which transforms the character of happening geopolitical rivalries is emerging. Outside actors such as the European Union must revolt against to these developments when shaping their policy answers.
International institutions and governance structures should reorganize to consider the growing weight of China, India and other emerging economies. Eventually, energy security and climate change discretion should be merged into an assimilated sustainable energy policy.
