This to those who are on higher rank.

This article (Smith and Block, 2016) discusses the regulations of Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the impact of them on the insider trading. It maintains that not only it is not a crime but also decreases the risk for investors and in some ways, everyone is harmed by the process of the market. Additionally, the authors state that due to the rapid of the contemporary trading markets, the regulations of SEC reduces the speed of transmission of information to those who are on higher rank. From a practical business perspective, insider trading is generally a negative expression and immoral, thus the arguments the authors provide have to be questioned. Insider trading is illegal and whoever does that should be considered as a criminal.

In addition, many people are hurt from the evolution of the market but we cannot say that all of them are gained from it. For example, if there is an inside information from a manager of some company, this information will be benefit only for the elite and for the regular investors. Subsequently, the insider trading steals the investors who do not have nonpublic information of receiving full values for their securities. Furthermore, the authors argued that the regulations of SEC decrease the speed of transmission of information to superiors. That is inaccurate because the SEC was created to limit frauds or manipulations and to secure better financial transparency and accuracy.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

As a result, the SEC does not reduce the speed of information, but monitor them. Lastly, insider trading could be legal only if the insider trader submits the information electronically to the SEC, thus this information will not be private anymore and could affect the stock price either with positive or negative way.

This article, written by Carol S.

Dweck, opened my eyes to an important topic I’ve never thought twice about; especially with my own kids. Brainology talks about fixed mindset vs. growth mindset and how the 1990’s was a time where praise and building self-esteem was thought to give children the confidence needed to succeed.Growth mindset reflects on the fact that your intelligence can be developed, and you can grow your ability to learn.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

During the study done on the kids entering 7th grade, Dweck found that students with this mindset wanted to learn and weren’t just interested in how smart they came across to others. This played a part in their idea of effort as well. They realized that the harder you work, the more you can grow.The study was also done with the fixed mindset point of view.

In that same study it was realized that the kids wouldn’t accept learning opportunities because it would basically be degrading to their intelligence. It would put them in a situation where they would think that if they didn’t know

This on the increase. From an environmental perspective,

This article (Economic Globalisation, 2008) discusses the part of Globalisation which is more able to be seen, causes and effects of it, from an economic perspective. It maintains that Globalisation is clearer in manufacturing because many companies have too many subsidiaries in many countries. The article also talks about the economic impact and the gap between the rich and poor countries. The author states that due to Globalisation the time that people work is on the increase.
From an environmental perspective, Globalisation is not clearer only in manufacturing. It may be visible in the environment too. Many companies in order to build their subsidiaries are able to harm the natural world. For example, in many countries, there is not enough land to build their factories, thus they are trying to cut down trees, so as to be able to build there. In addition, many of these pollute the rivers and the air by the exhaust fumes and all of these have a major impact on global warming. The authors of the article also do not evaluate completely the impact of Globalisation on nations. Due to this phenomenon, not only people around the world do not close together, but the variance between rich and poor countries became even bigger. All this burden is on the poor countries because due to the rise of demand for work, people of these countries have to work too many hours for a low wage and without the government provide them with the appropriate education and health care as the rich countries. For instance, many immigrants have to work with the minimum wage, so they do not have enough money to send to their families. Globalisation should be a matter of equality, not superiority.

x

Hi!
I'm Casey!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out